BOCIO CERVICOTORÁCICO ¿De qué depende el abordaje torácico?

Main Article Content

Osvaldo González Aguilar
David O. Simkin
Hugo A. Pardo
Román Seva
Daniel Delgado Marín
Sergio Dávila Quijano

Abstract

Background: Only 2% of cervicothoracic goiters are resected through a thoracic approach. There are no strict guidelines that dictate the need for this surgical approach.


Objective: Investigate clinical, radiographic factors associated with the need for a thoracic approach in cervicothoracic goiters.


Design: Retrospective - Observational.


Setting: Public tertiary care head and neck referral center.


Population: 54 patients, 51.8 male with a rate 1/1. mean age was 57.8 years, 29.6% recurred goiters, 81.5% was benign and hte rest malign tumours.


Methods: In 29.6% a thoracic approach was needed: sternotomy in 10, manubriotomy in 4 and lateral thoracotomy in 2. Total thyroidectomy was used i n72.2%.


Results: There were complications in 10 and sequelas in 8. 5 years overall survival in malignant tumors was 25%.


Conclusions: Cervicothoracic seems to be most appropriate term. Patients who needed thoracic approach were adult of both genders. Cervical approach solve most of cases. But 90% of malignant tu- mours needed any type of thoracic approach statiscally significant expressed. Carinal extension, aberrant or posterior goiters, always needed a thoracic approach. Lateral thoracotomy was reserved only for the last two types of goiters.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
González Aguilar, O., Simkin, D. O., Pardo, H. A., Seva, R., Delgado Marín, D., & Dávila Quijano, S. (2022). BOCIO CERVICOTORÁCICO ¿De qué depende el abordaje torácico?. Revista Argentina De Cirugía, 100(1-2), 23–28. Retrieved from https://revista.aac.org.ar/index.php/RevArgentCirug/article/view/504
Section
Original Article

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>